Author Topic: 12 inch skillet id  (Read 4117 times)

Wulfdog

  • Guest
12 inch skillet id
« on: January 09, 2005, 10:39:36 PM »
I have two identical 12 inch skillets and on the bottoms of them they only have 12 inch skillet made in USA on them.  ON the top of the handle they have a number 12 close to the lip.  Any idea who made these?  I kind of figured they are Lodge, but don't have lodge written on them.

I don't have a picture of them, but this ebay item looks identical to them.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=976&item=6144548691&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW

John
« Last Edit: January 09, 2005, 10:43:10 PM by Wulfdog »

Steve_Stephens

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2005, 10:48:18 PM »
John,
That's a Wagner in the link.  ALL Lodges I've seen have a heat ring that almost always has a break or three in the ring.  Most pieces from Lodge in the pre-mid 1990's period are unmarked.  The current Lodge logo was started sometime in the mid 1990's or later 1990's.

Steve

Wulfdog

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2005, 10:54:03 PM »
Now that has me wondering.  I'm at the office working on a pc and can't remember for sure, but think the ones I have are smooth bottomed with the heat rings.  Thanks for the help Steve.

Steve_Stephens

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2005, 11:02:21 PM »
Quote
but think the ones I have are smooth bottomed with the heat rings.  

Collectors generally refer to skillets without heat rings as smooth bottom skillets so, if the pan has a heat ring, it will have a heat ring bottom and won't be a smooth bottem.  Make sense?  You didn't have a heat ring on your bottom when you were a baby, did you?  You had a smooth bottom.
Steve

Wulfdog

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2005, 11:04:26 PM »
Hehehe yep.  Can you look at this and tell me if it is a Wapak?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=976&item=6143840803&rd=1

Steve_Stephens

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2005, 11:15:19 PM »
Man, what do we have to do with you newer collectors?  Lead you by the hand and tell you everything?  Hey, I don't mind.  Wish someone had lead me in my early days of collecting and wish there were more of the old timers who would share their knowledge with others.  I love it when people are hungry for information because I know that I was (and still am for new info).  There is so much to learn and know about iron cookware and a lot of the info comes only from experience and deduction; can't be found in any books or other literature.  Look at everything you see on iron cookware; little features and details, casting quality, markings, back of handles; all that stuff.  In time you can put this and that together to make a story and hope it adds up to facts.

This is a "AA" skillet suposedly made by Ahrens & Arnold in Wapakoneta.  No relation to Wapak that I know of,  I've seen a few of these and the one in the link is a poor casting or dirty; usually they are much better but not great castings.  Only skillets were made that I've seen.

Wulfdog

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2005, 11:38:02 PM »
Thanks Steve.  By the way RE: me being a newer collecter,  I just tried my first electrolysis on a pan today.  It's still cooking so I'll let you know how it turns out.  I have small charger hooked up to it.  The pan is in horrible condition.  I thought I'd start off with a really bad one for my first try.

John

Steve_Stephens

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2005, 01:33:09 AM »
You are way advanced over me in your cleaning methods.  I'm still  using the prehistoric lye dip methods.
Steve

Wulfdog

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2005, 01:56:17 PM »
Steve,  I ran the charger on the pan for 6 plus hours last night and the positive side of the setup was attached to a stainless steel spatula.  Well I have a spatula shaped clean spot on the bottom of the skillet where the rust and gunk was removed.  I see now why they say to have a large surface area for the item that is attracting the rust from the pan.  I guess you need a big round pan shaped piece of stainless steel the same size as the pan to get all the grime off it.  I'll keep experimenting.  I'm seriously considering hooking my electric welder up to it.  (Evil Frankensteinian Chuckle in the background)  [smiley=diablotin.gif] Like they say "Now your cooking with gas!"
« Last Edit: January 10, 2005, 01:58:53 PM by Wulfdog »

Troy_Hockensmith

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2005, 03:38:42 PM »
I know folks that cut a metal coffee can down the side and spread it out and use that. The main reason folks use stainless as it doesn't eat up quickly like regular metal does. It works alot like a sacrificial anode in boat motors.

Wulfdog

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2005, 04:36:30 PM »
Troy, Does it actually eat up the sacrificial peice of metal, and if so have I damaged my spatula for ever.

Also is only one side (the one facing the anode) the one that gets cleaned, so will I have to turn the pan around to do the other side?
« Last Edit: January 10, 2005, 04:48:45 PM by Wulfdog »

Offline Greg Stahl

  • Administrator
  • Regular member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14494
  • Karma: +3/-0
  • Ole Scratch
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2005, 06:56:40 AM »
John,
That is correct.  You get overall cleaning on metal items, if the entire surface is surrounded.
"NO MORE MISTER NICE GUY!!" Alice Cooper.

Troy_Hockensmith

  • Guest
Re: 12 inch skillet id
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2005, 11:01:26 AM »
Yeah it will eat it up. DOn;t ever mix up your leads. If you put positive on the piece your cleaning it will eat it up. .....Right Greg!