I've been lurking and reading for awhile now and this really interests me. It has been said that sandblasting "alters" the iron. I'll buy that. But, how much it does should be directly related to the grit used. Grit is available that is almost like powder it is so fine. Seems like that, followed by sandpaper, that others reccomend useing, might yield good results. Tom seems to take a very open minded look at blasting and different media without really comitting for or against.
It seems as "altering" the iron is pretty sacreligious, yet, Lodge, in not altering the iron, is chastised for that, yet old iron like Wagner and Griswold are praised for doing just that?!? And it was done in the very worst way according to Duke, by "grinding" the surface smooth. If grinding (altering) the iron is so bad, then why aren't all the old, ground, pieces just junk now, after all, they have been ground you know! :-?
If it is all just about the "look", then I can understand about keeping it original and all, but if it actually makes the iron useless, how so? And be specific if you know! I have a streak of a 'doubtingThomas' in me! :-/
Thanks for giving this a look!
Educate me!
Kelly